Monday, May 25, 2009

Unemployed Boogeyman Gives Speech, Film at Eleven



I’ll be frank; Dick Cheney used to scare the shit outta me. He was angry, shadowy, always hidden away in various secret locations when he wasn’t having heart attacks or shooting people in the face while hunting.

And Darth Veep went back underground since the end of the Bush administration, but he’d been flying under the radar for so long that it didn’t surprise anyone. He’d have stayed in the shadows, too…if Joe Biden, the loony riding His Obamaness’ coat-tails, hadn’t blabbed about the location of the secret bunker under the VP’s residence at the Naval Observatory, I think Dickie would still be down there eating Spam and MRE’s and sleeping with a Glock under his pillow.

However, the former Vice President made one hell of a surprising speech this week at the American Enterprise Institute, in which he blasted the Obama Administration like an atomic bomb at some points and praised it at others.

Here are some excerpts from the speech.

“In top secret meetings about enhanced interrogations, I made my own beliefs clear. I was and remain a strong proponent of our enhanced interrogation program. The interrogations were used on hardened terrorists after other efforts failed. They were legal, essential, justified, successful, and the right thing to do. The intelligence officers who questioned the terrorists can be proud of their work and proud of the results, because they prevented the violent death of thousands, if not hundreds of thousands, of innocent people.

Our successors in office have their own views on all of these matters.

By presidential decision, last month we saw the selective release of documents relating to enhanced interrogations. This is held up as a bold exercise in open government, honoring the public’s right to know. We’re informed, as well, that there was much agonizing over this decision.

Yet somehow, when the soul-searching was done and the veil was lifted on the policies of the Bush administration, the public was given less than half the truth. The released memos were carefully redacted to leave out references to what our government learned through the methods in question. Other memos, laying out specific terrorist plots that were averted, apparently were not even considered for release. For reasons the administration has yet to explain, they believe the public has a right to know the method of the questions, but not the content of the answers.

Over on the left wing of the president’s party, there appears to be little curiosity in finding out what was learned from the terrorists. The kind of answers they’re after would be heard before a so-called “Truth Commission.” Some are even demanding that those who recommended and approved the interrogations be prosecuted, in effect treating political disagreements as a punishable offense, and political opponents as criminals. It’s hard to imagine a worse precedent, filled with more possibilities for trouble and abuse, than to have an incoming administration criminalize the policy decisions of its predecessors…

… It is a fact that only detainees of the highest intelligence value were ever subjected to enhanced interrogation. You’ve heard endlessly about waterboarding. It happened to three terrorists. One of them was Khalid Sheikh Muhammed – the mastermind of 9/11, who has also boasted about beheading Daniel Pearl…

…We had a lot of blind spots after the attacks on our country. We didn’t know about al-Qaeda’s plans, but Khalid Sheikh Muhammed and a few others did know. And with many thousands of innocent lives potentially in the balance, we didn’t think it made sense to let the terrorists answer questions in their own good time, if they answered them at all…

…Even before the interrogation program began, and throughout its operation, it was closely reviewed to ensure that every method used was in full compliance with the Constitution, statutes, and treaty obligations. On numerous occasions, leading members of Congress, including the current speaker of the House, were briefed on the program and on the methods…

…Behind the overwrought reaction to enhanced interrogations is a broader misconception about the threats that still face our country. You can sense the problem in the emergence of euphemisms that strive to put an imaginary distance between the American people and the terrorist enemy. Apparently using the term “war” where terrorists are concerned is starting to feel a bit dated. So henceforth we’re advised by the administration to think of the fight against terrorists as, quote, “Overseas contingency operations.” In the event of another terrorist attack on America, the Homeland Security Department assures us it will be ready for this, quote, “man-made disaster” – never mind that the whole Department was created for the purpose of protecting Americans from terrorist attack.

And when you hear that there are no more, quote, “enemy combatants,” as there were back in the days of that scary war on terror, at first that sounds like progress. The only problem is that the phrase is gone, but the same assortment of killers and would-be mass murderers are still there. And finding some less judgmental or more pleasant-sounding name for terrorists doesn’t change what they are – or what they would do if we let them loose…

…To put things in perspective, suppose that on the evening of 9/11, President Bush and I had promised that for as long as we held office – which was to be another 2,689 days – there would never be another terrorist attack inside this country. Talk about hubris – it would have seemed a rash and irresponsible thing to say. People would have doubted that we even understood the enormity of what had just happened. Everyone had a very bad feeling about all of this, and felt certain that the Twin Towers, the Pentagon, and Shanksville were only the beginning of the violence.

Of course, we made no such promise. Instead, we promised an all-out effort to protect this country. We said we would marshal all elements of our nation’s power to fight this war and to win it. We said we would never forget what had happened on 9/11, even if the day came when many others did forget. We spoke of a war that would “include dramatic strikes, visible on TV, and covert operations, secret even in success.” We followed through on all of this, and we stayed true to our word.

To the very end of our administration, we kept al-Qaeda terrorists busy with other problems. We focused on getting their secrets, instead of sharing ours with them. And on our watch, they never hit this country again. After the most lethal and devastating terrorist attack ever, seven and a half years without a repeat is not a record to be rebuked and scorned, much less criminalized. It is a record to be continued until the danger has passed.

Along the way there were some hard calls. No decision of national security was ever made lightly, and certainly never made in haste. As in all warfare, there have been costs – none higher than the sacrifices of those killed and wounded in our country’s service. And even the most decisive victories can never take away the sorrow of losing so many of our own – all those innocent victims of 9/11, and the heroic souls who died trying to save them.

For all that we’ve lost in this conflict, the United States has never lost its moral bearings. And when the moral reckoning turns to the men known as high-value terrorists, I can assure you they were neither innocent nor victims. As for those who asked them questions and got answers: they did the right thing, they made our country safer, and a lot of Americans are alive today because of them.

Like so many others who serve America, they are not the kind to insist on a thank-you. But I will always be grateful to each one of them, and proud to have served with them for a time in the same cause. They, and so many others, have given honorable service to our country through all the difficulties and all the dangers. I will always admire them and wish them well. And I am confident that this nation will never take their work, their dedication, or their achievements, for granted…”


By far, it was the most I’d ever heard Cheney say in the past 9 years. Dude still kinda gives me the willies but it’s good to hear him defend against all his detractors out there. I think if Dickie had been a bit more engaging during the administration and a bit less angry-looking, the American public would have trusted him more. I’m still not a hunnert percent convinced he wasn’t raking in millions off the Iraq war through Halliburton and their no-bid contracts. I’m not a hunnert percent convinced we didn’t invade both Afghanistan and Iraq as knee-jerk responses to 9/11 before we had all the proper intel.

However, I do think that we gained valuable intel from enhanced interrogation techniques that foiled plots and saved lives. I also feel that if we turn the Gitmo Gang loose, within 6 months every last swingin’ dick one of them will be back to making car bombs and killing Americans, and half of America will say that we’re the bad guys while the terrorists cut some American’s head off live on streaming Internet while some Muslim Mickey Mouse sings in the background about killing Isrealis and Americans. Remember, the Religion of Peace and all that… and we’re the bad guys… sure, and we need to cite all the legalisms for everything we do because they’re just poor oppressed Muslim freedom fighters.

3 comments:

j summ said...

i personally like it when a politician, or anyone else, tells an opponent to fuck off. that's called 'keepin' it real', where i come from. not playing fake to keep or make friends, just letting someone know how you feel about their two-faced self.

i would still hunt with that guy if he ever called, cause it was just a lawyer, and who doesn't want to limit out on them?

great speech, hits a lot of points i've made myself to shithead posters like JIM. like he said, our enemies didn't just disappear because dumbshit JIM and his friends got the lincoln of our times elected. they're still out there looking to kill infidels, including JIM.

Someone PLEASE tell me just exactly what IS super b's plan for keeping me safe from terrorists? i guess i missed that while he was bowing to the king of saudi arabia, seizing control of GM, and giving chrysler to the unions, all while continuing to drive the economy into the toilet. But he does have a cool new dog, and his wife has some fancy tennis shoes.

j summett said...

Dick Cheney, for me, could do no wrong after his debate with John, I'm not the baby's daddy, Edwards. He flat out schooled him in front of a national audience.

Is he dry? Wry? You bet. But the man knows that of which he speaks. The problem with our nation today is we want our politicians to be rock stars, the next American Idol. We don't want our politicians to have formed, intelligent opinions or working theories, as long as they look good on t.v. Examples anyone? Bill Clinton, John Edwards, John 'Botox' Kerry, and we cannot forget, His Obamaness.

I will take substance (Cheney) over style (Obama) any day of the week!!

Randy said...

I've always felt he was one of the smartest people in politics. Scary, yes, dry, very, un-rock star? absolutely. But smart.