Sunday, July 27, 2014

Leftist Rolling Stone gets completely owned on Guns and Gun Control

I've always been a  huge music fan and early on I found a love for reading about music artists and the industry. Maybe deep down I always wanted to be a famous rock star instead of a struggling writer. Neil Tennant of the Pet Shop Boys went from being a music writer to being a music star, but I think most music writers are failed musicians, much like movie critics tend to be failed film makers.

I used to really enjoy reading the latest issues of magazines like SPIN, Alternative Press, and of course Rolling Stone. I used to read Details in my 20s for the music articles rather than the BS fashion crap. I gave up on details when it became just non-stop ads for over-priced suits for underfed guys and there were so many cologne ads the magazine smelled like a whorehouse. I gave up on Alternative Press when alternative music no longer meant Depeche Mode and The Cure and instead meant Pearl Jam and Nirvana. And then there's Rolling Stone....

I always had a love/hate relationship with it...they had a lot of articles on music, but never failed to give terrible reviews to albums I loved and did snarky sarcastic a-hole articles about bands I liked. Eventually I gave up on them when they dropped all pretense of journalistic non-bias and just became a mouthpiece propaganda rag for Liberal views and the Democrat party. Then again, the bulk of the media machine in this country is controlled by The Left or worse.

Kissing up to the Democrats, talking trash about guns, and pushing Pearl Jam. Yeah, I was done.


Recently, Rolling Stone became a total laughingstock when their website did an absolutely RIDICULOUS slideshow listing "The Most Dangerous Guns" . Piss-poor writing, atrocious research (or a complete lack thereof), and total leftist gun-control hogwash. It does, however, highlight perfectly the Left's anti-gun bias and the gleeful willingness with which the mainstream media serves their puppet masters as a propaganda tool.

Look, I've written about gun control before. You know I'm all in favor of responsible gun ownership and the right to self-defense. See that little SEARCH block in the upper left of my blog? Type in "gun control" and the articles will just fly up, probably a good 14 articles or so. To me, Gun Control means using both hands, and safely & responsibly handling & carrying it legally.

The following are actual screen captures from their site. They are painful to read if you're a shooter or can at least rub two brain cells together. I'll throw in some commentary along the way.

Allow me to start by saying that firearms come in two species: Civilian and Military. I make that distinction because machineguns and fully automatic battle rifles are not civilian weapons and in 99% of cases need not be owned by civilians. It's one thing if you're a specially-licensed and trained civilian business operator who owns automatic weapons for rental purposes at a range facility where someone can go, pay a fee, receive training, and be allowed to fire said automatic weapons in a safe, controlled environment at targets. It's quite another if you're just Joe Yahoo who wants to spray a belt of ammo at cans in the backyard. Next, firearms of a civilian nature come in two types: Long Guns and Hand Guns. Pretty simple, right? Long guns fire from the shoulder, and include rifles and shotguns, as well as black powder (ie: muskets). Handguns, also called pistols, include semi-automatics, revolvers, single-shot pistols, and black powder pistols.  However, Rolling Stone managed to screw all of this up so utterly and completely that it boggles the mind. Please click the pics to embiggen them.


Okay....a short stock? What the blue hell is that? Pistols have no stocks. The stock is that piece at the rear of a long gun that nestles into your shoulder. A built-in barrel? As opposed to what? Please clarify this hideously stupid phrase.Nice move on pointing out the popularity of Glock handguns to demonize them. Most dumb-ass liberals think all semi-auto pistols are Glocks. Interesting that your next statistic is how they're popular with law-enforcement, but your readers will just equate them with crime. Also, nice of you to toss out a shooting term like "short-recoil operated" without explaining what that means or offering any other form of operation like blowback...


Revolvers are pistols and pistols are handguns. Just sayin'. I really have to shake my head at the dumb here. It's the cylinder that revolves, not the barrel. This isn't an Gatling gun for Christ's sake. And I'm sure the 46,000 revolvers recovered in 2012 are included in the pistol numbers above, right? And why confuse the issue by talking this nonsense about grenade launchers, shotguns, and rifles with rotating barrels?

Shotguns don't spray. While a shotgun may be able to fire a shot shell that contains multiple projectiles (or "shot", hence the term shotgun) civilian shotguns are not fully automatic weapons. At least you described what semi-automatic means in that one trigger pull equals one round being fired, but you idiots always make every rifle sound like a full-auto weapon that empties a magazine with a single trigger action. You talk about hunting yet don't show a standard hunting rifle, instead choosing to display an AR-platform rifle, specifically the Bushmaster used by the shooter at Sandy Hook. Nice typo, Editor. (an bad fit)

Again, the implication that shotguns spray bullets like a belt-fed machine gun. You also make it sound like the firing action of rifles vs. shotguns is dramatically different. While the design of the cartridges are different, both operate in the same manner, with the firing pin striking the primer, which ignites the gunpowder in the cartridge. The energy expended by the igniting gunpowder sends the projectile(s) down range at the target.


Again...these are pistols. Handguns. Another nice typo (bee linked) I swear to God you only included a fifth type of weapon because it made it a conveniently numbered list at five. And instead of any real information on them, (2000 recoveries but how many murders via small-caliber single shot pocket guns?) you instead roll right into saying anything with a high-cap magazine are assault weapons linked to mass shootings. At least you were honest enough to admit that the definitions for "assault weapons" are numerous and that they are linked to a small minority of murders, you confuse the readers by putting semi-automatic and rapid-fire in the same sentence. Semi-auto means that a round is fired with each trigger pull, not that it is full-auto (or, dare we say rapid fire). It will fire just as rapidly as you can pull the trigger. I've seen master shooters who can fire all six rounds from a revolver just as fast as firing six rounds from a semi-auto pistol.

Part of the problem one encounters with ignorant liberal media types is that they know nothing about guns nor do they want to. To them, guns are evil and scary and no one should have them but when they need help the first person they scream for is a cop with a gun. To them all guns are the same, and they care not a whit to learn proper gun terms or understand how they work, or even who can legally own what.





The above picture about the barrel shroud deserves an explanation. The McCarthy in question is Representative Carolyn McCarthy (D-NY). On the April 18, 2007, episode of MSNBC's program Tucker, Tucker Carlson interviewed McCarthy about the Virginia Tech massacre and her proposed reauthorization of the Federal Assault Weapons Ban. He asked her to explain the need to regulate barrel shrouds, one of the many provisions included in her bill. She did not directly respond, instead stating it was more important that the legislation would ban large capacity "clips" (see above pics) of the type used in the Virginia Tech massacre and that the class of guns chosen prohibited by the law were those used by gangs and killers of police officers. Know what? The killer at Virginia tech had 17 magazines for his weapons. Most of them were 10-round magazines, though some were fifteen. Any idea how long it takes to change a magazine? I can do it pretty damned fast. With practice you can drop one and insert another in about 2 and a half seconds. And more cops are killed by handguns than so-called assault rifles. When Carlson pressed her twice more on the question about barrel shrouds, she admitted that she did not know what a barrel shroud was, and incorrectly stated, "I believe it is a shoulder thing that goes up." . This is the same New York Liberal Democrat suing 70 companies around Long Island for potentially causing via asbestos her treatable form of lung cancer despite being an avid smoker for 40 years. These people have no shame.

It's amusing in a Schadenfreude kind of way to see her futile attempts to dodge the question, and her even more futile flailing around for an answer. It's also a prime example of the insufferable arrogance of people who propose to regulate things of which they have absolutely no understanding and to propose penalties for infractions--to try to send people to prison for ten years, for committing a "crime" that the lawmaker cannot define.  For the record, a barrel shroud is a covering attached to the barrel of a firearm, that partially or completely encircles the barrel which prevents operators from injuring themselves on a hot barrel.



The comments that the article received were priceless. Once word of the inane nature of the list got out, gun owners flocked to see for themselves just how ludicrous it really was. These are actual screen caps from the comments.


Liberal media types care not a whit if they get it wrong. Their readers are for the most part completely gun ignorant and fear that which they don't understand. Last year when lone gunman Aaron Alexis went on his killing spree at the Washington Navy Yard, the below picture was what ran in the New York Daily News:
But there's a problem. It wasn't the same gun. Not even close. Alexis smuggled in a disassembled Remington 870 Express 12-gauge shotgun and used it to kill his victims. He eventually began using a Beretta 9mm pistol he took from a security guard he'd killed. At no time during the incident did he have in his possession an AR-type rifle like the one shown in the picture, but they had two priorities with this sensationalized headline: Get people to read their rag by invoking a previous mass killing, and to demonize those scary black guns.

Nope...not the same gun.


When properly and responsibly handled by a trained and licensed law-abiding citizen for self-defense, weapons save lives. Sometimes the mere presence of an armed citizen can deter a gunman without further shots fired like at the Clackamas Mall shooting in Oregon, or several other incidents where an armed citizen kept a situation from getting worse. Just this week in suburban Philadelphia a psychiatric patient pulled out a gun at a hospital complex and opened fire on his caseworker and psychiatrist. The caseworker was killed, and though wounded the doctor was able to draw his own personal firearm and return fire, ending  the attack before it could escalate further.

Guns save lives, but don't tell that to the gun control zombies. Former New York City Mayor Mike Bloomberg thinks anyone who owns a gun is a lunatic. This from a Limousine Liberal Elitist who lives in a palace guarded by armed security as he spews his crap. Same guy who didn't want you to drink soda or eat salt. It's that babysitting nanny-state mentality of the Left that gets people killed.

Yeah, I do have a right. And I have a right to drink all the mother effing soda I want and eat all the mother effing salt I want.
Way to go, New Jersey. Stay classy. And while you're at it, maybe find out why it took over thirty minutes for an ambulance to get to the mall where the Friedlands were carjacked.

Keep up the good work, Libs. Make sure you keep citizens unarmed and defenseless. Make sure you have lots of Gun Free Zones that act as a beacon to criminals who know that they can kill at will and no one will fire back. Make sure law enforcement is out writing chickenshit tickets for parking offenses to generate revenue for the city coffers instead of actually fighting crime. Make sure you crow about stronger gun laws when you don't enforce the ones already on the books. Make new laws that drive gun manufacturers out  and take jobs and tax revenue away from  your blue states. Keep on ignoring an Attorney General who sells guns to Mexican drug cartels that are used to kill Americans. Sit back and watch your constituency in heavily gun-controlled Third World cities like Chicago and Detroit and Baltimore kill each other off every weekend over which gang controls the crack deals on which corner. You're Liberal Democrats; it's what you do.

And Media, make sure you keep running erroneous sensationalized crapfests. It keeps the mindless sheeple afraid of scary black guns and ostracizes law-abiding gun owners. Make sure you get it all wrong, or at best half true on a good day. You're the Lamestream Leftist Media; it's what you do. At least when you're not covering the latest Miley twerk or Kardashian whatever-the-hell-Kardashians-do.



Practice what you preach, Liberals.....

Wednesday, July 23, 2014

Passing the BUK on MH17


So...for the second time in four months, Malaysian Airlines has lost a Boeing 777 jetliner with all on board. If not for the nearly 600 dead souls it would almost be comical. Instead it's criminal but the UN will just shake their fists while doing nothing of consequence. The Ukrainians are more than just a tad embarrassed that a civilian jetliner is unable to transit over their country without being attacked. They're also secretly relieved that something got shot down besides one of their aircraft, since they seem to be losing them at an alarming rate to a surprisingly well-equipped ragamuffin resistance movement. Oh, wait...Moscow is supplying these clowns with whatever they want. But I digress.

Malaysian Airlines Flight MH17 was cruising at 33,000 feet over the area of border fighting in Ukraine on a flight from Amsterdam to Kuala Lampur when it was blown out of the sky by at least one and probably two missiles presumably fired from a Russian-made SAM system called the BUK. Introduced in 1980 and known to NATO as the SA-11, it was designed to hit high-flying targets at altitudes of up to 80,000 feet. By today's standards it is somewhat primitive as it uses a rudimentary radar system that in stand-alone mode isn't linked to a more sophisticated radar and identification network that can distinguish between military and civilian aircraft by their transponder signals alone.



Why the hell Russia would provide the hillbilly rebels of Donestsk with something that despite its age still requires months of training to achieve proficiency with? Because they simply don't give a shit. They want Ukraine back under Soviet Russsian control and are more than willing to give the barely organized rabble fighting against the Ukrainian government whatever they need to kill as many Ukrainians as possible and cause as much chaos as is necessary to get Ukraine to capitulate.

While they may have allegedly pulled their soldiers back across the border into Russia, when Putin originally sent troops into Ukraine a few months under the guise of  "protecting ethnic Russians who voted to secede from Ukraine", they sent in long-range self-propelled artillery and sowed minefields. That's invasion, not peacekeeping. They still have thousands of troops massed on the border awaiting the word to fully invade and take over the former "breadbasket of the Soviet Union".

February 2014. Hey CNN, those aren't tanks but 152mm howitzers with a 20-mile range. Nice try though.
Russian anti-tank minefield on the Ukraine border, February 2014.
Could Russia have printed the minefield caution sign any smaller? Did they remove the mines when they left?

It says "STOP MINES!" Know why it's called a mine? Once you step on it it's all yours.

Ukraine has released videos allegedly showing the BUK missile systems traveling through eastern Ukraine near the site where the plane went down. Reports that rebels had possession of a BUK-M1 came as early as June 29, when rebels overran a Ukrainian military base in the conflict zone in eastern Ukraine.

BUK system trundling into Torez

BUK parked in a cozy square in downtown Torez.


The counterintelligence chief at Ukraine’s national security service, Vitaly Nayda, said that his agency became aware that the rebels possessed three BUK-M1 antiaircraft systems as of July 14. At least one was spotted heading into the town of Torez, the most likely location where the missile that downed MH17 were fired from, two hours before the plane was downed. One was later spotted missing two missiles.

Photographs and electronic intercepts, compiled by Ukrainian intelligence operatives, show that three BUK-M1 systems were shipped out of eastern Ukraine in the early morning of July 18, just hours after MH17 was shot down, according to Mr. Nayda. He said that a system missing a missile crossed the border in a flatbed truck to Russia at 2 a.m. on July 18, and two other missile systems with a complete set of missiles in their battery crossed at 4 a.m. The first BUK was filmed as early in the evening as 8:45 PM local time in eastern Ukraine on the border with Russia.

I do not like your BUK on a truck. I do not like it worth a...
 
A social media post by a rebel trooper named Sergei Paschenko (who has since deleted his account and has probably been fed to feral dogs for his transgression against the rebellion and/or Moscow) showed young Sergei, a former Russian-trained air-defense crewman, posing in Ukraine with a BUK system.

Hey everybody look at me with the top secret thing I'm not supposed to talk about
 Paschenko's deleted social media site contained dialogue with a woman called Viktoria dated June 25.

Viktoria: 'So what detachment you are serving in?'
Sergei: 'In a secret one.'
Viktoria: 'Is it really so secret?'
Sergei:  'Yes, this is the most secret air defence ever.'

There is footage out there of militants yukking it up and laughing in the minutes after the missile launch as flaming debris rained down to earth.


This is alleged to have been taken a few seconds after the launch, showing the smoke trails of the missiles.
 
The plane's black boxes were taken away by the rebels and spirited away to Russia. A dollar says Moscow wanted to hear the tapes first to see if anyone in the cockpit said something incriminating, like, maybe, "Oh shit that's a missile!". After much hue and cry from the West, the boxes have been returned to investigators.

The other reports coming out are FAR more disturbing. The cretins disguising themselves as some sort of people's militia impeded access to crash wreckage since the very beginning, most often at gunpoint. However, while keeping investigators and westerners away from the scene, they did nothing to keep their own people out and seemed to let pro-Russian locals meander about at will taking cell-phone pictures.


All that's missing is a pickup truck with a set of metal testicles hanging from the bumper.

The undisciplined rabble have been seen looting the wreckage at every turn, stealing anything of value they can get their hands on. One militia member was seen about to pocket a pair of binoculars until he saw the lenses were shattered, so he tossed it back on the ground, near an empty case that once held an expensive camera. Another rebel was spotted finding and pocketing a gold ring off a corpse. A news correspondent at the scene saw empty wallets and open purses strewn on the ground. There were also unconfirmed reports on social media that smartphones and jewelry had appeared in local market stalls. Families of victims were urgently cancelling their loved ones’ credit cards and mobile phone accounts after desperate relatives revealed how they had called the cell phones of their loves ones - only for them to be answered by strangers with 'eastern European-sounding voices'. Total scumbaggery

Common thieves of uncommon audacity. Pocketing a gold ring off a corpse.

The rebel leader has basically admitted people have been looting the crash site, stealing from corpses, and scavenging aluminum to sell, by issuing a decree that all items are to be turned in to his headquarters, but not so that they could be given back. This clown intends to use the pillaged loot to fund his own defenses. The order read:
  'To all detachments of Donetsk People's Republic army, to soldiers and commanders who from 18 to 21 July 2014 in the area where the Boeing 777 of Malaysian airlines crashed and who possess personal belongings related to this airplane. Before 8 pm on 23 July 2014 you must give these things away to the headquarters of DPR army. Valuable items (watches, earrings, lockets and other jewelry) must be sent to the DPR Defence Fund.'
It is signed by rebel army commander Colonel Igor Strelkov, and carries what appears to be an official stamp. The alleged order has been posted on social media websites in Ukraine and Russia.


New evidence has also emerged that the rebels allegedly planned to sabotage the investigation by contaminating the site with parts from other planes. However, it doesn't take a genius to see that this plane was shot down. Pieces of the fuselage are riddled with shrapnel punctures indicative of a proximity missile detonation.



International monitors who have finally gained full access to the crash site said Tuesday the plane's cockpit inexplicably had been sawed in half with diesel-powered cutters. Also, "The rear part of the aircraft, one of the biggest intact pieces, has definitely been hacked into," said Michael Bociurkiw, spokesman for the group of international monitors from the Organization for Security and Cooperation in Europe (OSCE)."The separatists are removing evidence from the crash site," he said. "All of which begs the question: What are they trying to hide?"


These animals, in their flagrant disregard for humanity and zeal to steal anything they could grab, allowed victims' corpses to fester in the sun for days. Once picked clean they allowed investigators to start bagging the bodies and parts of bodies up. Rumors circulated that some bodies were taken away and possibly even shipped back to their Russian masters. After days in the sun they were finally placed on a refrigerated rail car and shipped a couple hundred miles to a location where they could be flown out to the Netherlands. Rebel commanders claim that bodies or parts of bodies from all 298 on board were recovered and sent but other reports state that only 200 were recovered, meaning that damn near a third of the dead are unaccounted for and still feeding the local wildlife. Thanks to Russia and their minions, death holds no dignity for the victims of their slaughter.

Not that this is anything new. Undisciplined Red Army troops looted with impunity in World War Two. Whatever the Wehrmacht didn't loot in Poland in the beginning of the war the Soviets stole at the end. They stole from Russian peasants in the name of the State and the Rodina, stole from everyone the allegedly liberated before enslaving in Communism, and then pillaged the burnt out husk of a defeated Germany. They were caught looting in Georgia a few years back when they invaded. It's the Russian way seemingly. The only difference between the military's thugs and those of the Russian Mafia is that only one group has control of the nation's nuclear weapons, and we're not sure which group that is.

Furthermore, shooting down civilian jetliners is nothing new for Moscow. Just ask the families of the 269 people killed when a Soviet Sukhoi-15 shot down Korean Airlines Flight 007 in 1983. 

Russians shooting down airliners, Americans dying in the Middle East, turmoil in Israel.  History repeats itself.

Meanwhile, Obama interrupted his non-stop campaigning and fundraising and golfing and vacationing to issue a brief, impotent babble of empty words before going back to doing nothing as usual. Then again, he was quoted in 2012 while talking to Dmitry Medvedyev that he could tell Vladimir he'd be more more flexible after the elections. Meanwhile Russian bombers fly off our coasts and over our fleets unimpeded, and the current score is Russia 2, Civilian Jetliners 0.

Thursday, July 10, 2014

Could Illegals Be the Next Bio-Weapons?

So.... while El Presidente Obeezy was in Texas yesterday, instead of visiting the border to see first-hand where the flood of illegals is invading the United States like a plague of locusts, he instead continued fund-raising for Leftist Democrats. He hit the photo ops instead of visiting San Antonio's Lackland Air Force Base, where some of the illegals are being housed.

You see, if El Jefe ain't on vacation or on the golf course or fund-raising, he's on TV lying about whatever the scandal du jour is. Veterans are dying in hallways, a Marine is in a Mexican jail, and Obeezy is in photo op after photo op.

This latest flood of illegals isn't a surprise to the Junta in Washington. They knew it was coming. Back in January on a government business opportunities website they were advertising for contractors to escort as many as 65,000 underaged illegals from the US-Mexico border to various relocation centers within the US.



So they were looking for these transportation companies 7 months ago. Why? Because they knew they were coming. They knew that the way the craptastical laws are here in ObeezyLand that they won't deport underaged minor children to their home countries. They knew it would be a great way to lock in the Latino vote by offering blanket amnesty.

They knew and their buddies at the UN knew. So the UN, that useless pack of leeches living high on the American tit, is now urging the US to declare this flood of humans to be refugees. Officials with the U.N. High Commissioner for Refugees say they hope to see a regional agreement on refugee status Thursday when migration and interior department representatives from the U.S., Mexico, and Central America meet in Nicaragua. The group will discuss updating a 30-year-old declaration regarding the obligations nations have to aid refugees.

While such a resolution would lack any legal weight in the United States, the agency said it believes “the U.S. and Mexico should recognize that this is a refugee situation, which implies that they shouldn’t be automatically sent to their home countries but rather receive international protection.”

International Protection? So does that mean the UN or the international community is going to pony up any money to take care of these people? Of course not, because the UN firmly believes that the United States is the world's babysitter and bank. They leech in style in Manhattan and send our money worldwide.

So we're trillions in debt, and Obeezy wants Congress to somehow print up 4 billion dollars to take care of all these people magically walking here from all over Central America. I have an idea...get with Hillary Clinton and find the missing six billion her State Department lost when she was in charge and pay for it with that.



So now camps are being set up all over the southwest to take care of these new illegals ( I refuse to call them refugees. Why are these ones refugees but not anyone else who came here illegally in the past? Elian Gonzalez was ostensibly a refugee and we sent his ass packing back to Cuba. In fact, didn't Bill Clinton send him back?) The camp in Murietta, outside San Diego, is the scene of full-scale protests against the housing of illegals there. The government's response? Sending in armed agents in full riot gear to ensure the busloads of illegals get to the camp. A Congressman  was actually denied entry to the camp erected at Fort Sill in Oklahoma. Representative Jim Bridenstine (R-OK) said, “There is no excuse for denying a Federal Representative from Oklahoma access to a federal facility in Oklahoma where unaccompanied children are being held,”

Bridenstine went to Fort Sill to observe the conditions under which some 1,200 unaccompanied alien children (UAC, the new euphamism in government-speak for illegal kids) housed there are living and to find out to whom they would be released. But when he showed up at the facility, Bridenstine says he was told by a guard with a security unit which calls itself the “Brown Shirts” that he could not observe the children or their living conditions. BROWN SHIRTS? Um, yeah....Hitler had Brown Shirts too. That's just creepy as hell.

Obama Macht Frei! Heil Obama!

When the Congressman spoke to a manager and HHS official, he was told he would have to schedule a formal visit for July 21.

“Any Member of Congress should have the legal authority to visit a federal youth detention facility without waiting three weeks,” Bridenstine said in a statement.

Though unable to get inside the facility, Bridenstine described its exterior. “A new fence has been erected by HHS, completely surrounding the barracks and covered with material to totally obscure the view,” he said, adding that “every gate is chained closed. What are they trying to hide?” Bridenstine asked. “Do they not want the children to speak with Members of Congress?”

No, sir. They don't want you to see that these illegals are crawling with lice and are carrying all manner of diseases. One relief worker at Lackland has said on some of these kids you can literally see the lice crawling down their faces. They're showing up with severe cases of chicken pox and scabies and virulently resistant strains of tuberculosis. They are systematically trying to cover up this info so the American people will stay docile and not protest this invasion.


I see a bigger problem looming on the horizon. Of course I do; I see outside the box.


You see, if they knew in advance that these illegals were coming, they have to be coordinating with Mexico. And security in Mexico is as loose as a two-dollar whore. You can buy intel about Los Estados Unidos from any government official. So, there's gotta be some drug lords sending dope up with these people. They just drop it off along the way after they cross the border. Or, some drug lords take some money from a guy representing, say..... Al Qaeda and the Taliban. This guy wants to start infecting kids with various things to send across the border.

In America we've eradicated crap like tuberculosis, and until recently measles (people refusing to vaccinate their kids against measles has caused a couple recent outbreaks). We can generally handle stuff like that. With a little luck and skill we can keep stuff like typhoid/typhus and cholera from breaking out at these camps because we know how to avoid such contamination. We had an interesting scare a couple days ago  when news came out that a forgotten batch of smallpox virus was found in an old storage room at the CDC. Seems the only two places left where theres still stockpiles of smallpox virus is here at the CDC and at a place in Russia. Now THAT is a scary thought... we know how good Russian security can be at times concerning missing weapons and stuff....

But what happens when they send over a bunch of kids loaded down with Ebola, or Marburg, or some new strain of Bird Flu/SARS/MERS or some other delicious designer disease? Could enemies of America be sending living biological weapons across our border infected with things that could quickly take out an entire city? We're letting people in like it's a Black Friday sale at Best Buy and they could be loaded with Black Plague. We're housing them at American military bases.... do the math, people.




Instead of securing our borders, we're possibly letting in the very means of our own destruction.

Wake the hell up. Do something.